| From: | "Andrew Hammond" <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base |
| Date: | 2007-02-13 18:11:08 |
| Message-ID: | 1171390267.966146.124320@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 12, 5:16 pm, j(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)commandprompt(dot)com ("Joshua D. Drake") wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> >> Is this a known problem? Is there any test procedure that builds the
> >> "base" distribution before release?
>
> > Most of the core team is convinced that the postgresql-foo tarballs are
> > useless, but Marc insists on keeping them. But since they are nearly
> > useless, no one tests them, so it is not surprising that they don't
> > work.
>
> Why do we keep them again? I can't recall at any point in the life of
> CMD us ever using the -foo tarballs. Not to mention they just take up space.
>
> Let's dump them.
The FreeBSD database/postgres* ports depend on them. Which is probably
why Marc insists on keeping them.
Andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-13 18:15:29 | Re: cuckoo is hung during regression test |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-13 18:10:39 | Re: Faster StrNCpy |