From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
Date: | 2007-01-25 16:31:21 |
Message-ID: | 45B8DB59.2090908@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>> the patch. I'm personally not sold on the need for modifications to the
>> SQL grammar, for example, as opposed to just using a set of SQL-callable
>> functions and some new system catalogs.
>
> SQL grammar isn't changed significantly - just add variants of
> CREATE/DROP/ALTER /COMMENTS commands. Next, functions haven't
> autocomplete feature or built-in quick help - if you don't remember
> exactly kind/type of argument(s) of function then you should read a docs.
I didn't read the patch but I did skim the docs for this and if the docs
are current I see things like this:
CREATE FULLTEXT DICTIONARY en_ispell
( OPT = 'DictFile="ispell/english.dict",
AffFile="ispell/english.aff",
StopFile="english.stop"'
) LIKE ispell_template;
ALTER FULLTEXT DICTIONARY en_stem SET OPT='english.stop';
Which to me is perfectly reasonable and intuitive. It is unfortunate
though that we still have the more odd grammar of actually using Tsearch
to query. Although I don't really have a better suggestion without
adding some ungodly obscure operator.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ray Stell | 2007-01-25 16:33:29 | Re: [HACKERS] how to plan for vacuum? |
Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2007-01-25 16:26:12 | Re: ECPG buglet? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-25 16:33:50 | Re: Getting rid of warnings |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-01-25 16:28:06 | Re: Getting rid of warnings |