Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD
Date: 2007-01-02 20:54:59
Message-ID: 459AC6A3.2000202@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> ... And then we'd need to change the regression makefile to use
>> the option, based on an environment variable a bit like MAX_CONNEXCTIONS
>> maybe.
>>
>
> Why wouldn't we just use it always? If a regression test dumps core,
> that's going to deserve investigation.
>
>
>

Revised patch attached, doing just this. I will apply it soon unless
there are objections.

cheers

andrew

Attachment Content-Type Size
corepatch text/plain 6.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-02 20:59:34 Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Previous Message David Boreham 2007-01-02 20:52:45 Re: TODO: GNU TLS

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-02 20:59:34 Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-02 20:23:57 Re: xlog directory at initdb time