| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD |
| Date: | 2006-12-29 21:44:39 |
| Message-ID: | 17831.1167428679@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> ... And then we'd need to change the regression makefile to use
> the option, based on an environment variable a bit like MAX_CONNEXCTIONS
> maybe.
Why wouldn't we just use it always? If a regression test dumps core,
that's going to deserve investigation.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-12-29 22:03:05 | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-29 21:43:24 | Re: Load distributed checkpoint |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-12-29 23:08:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-29 21:43:24 | Re: Load distributed checkpoint |