| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE |
| Date: | 2006-12-10 23:40:17 |
| Message-ID: | 457C9AE1.2040107@paradise.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> We might be able to finesse the protocol problem by teaching EA to
> respond to query cancel by emitting the data-so-far as a NOTICE (like it
> used to do many moons ago), rather than a standard query result, then
> allowing the query to error out. However this'd be fairly unfriendly
> for client-side tools that are expecting a query result.
>
wouldn't the above be ok - given that the primary use for this EA
extension is troublesome query debugging anyway ?
Cheers
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-12-10 23:47:10 | 8.2 Partition lock changes and resource queuing. |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-12-10 23:24:12 | Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE |