| From: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mikael Carneholm <Mikael(dot)Carneholm(at)WirelessCar(dot)com>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)tocr(dot)com>, David Goodenough <david(dot)goodenough(at)btconnect(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance figures from DbMail list |
| Date: | 2006-12-08 21:44:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4579DCC7.9040206@myemma.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:04, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
>
>> This link adds to the joy...
>>
>> http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181
>>
>> So the most popular free "database" in the world is a lousy performing
>> product that accepts 'gabba gabba hey' as a valid timestamp. Someone
>> please, give me a reason not to get cynical...
>>
>
> Oh man, that poor guy. He's got 4 or 5 machines in a cluster, and he's
> still not catching up to the one machine postgresql server.
>
> And he's switching because he wants better reliability?
>
> Guess he's never heard of pgpool, slony, mammoth replicator, cjdbc, or a
> half dozen other ways to get high reliability with postgresql.
>
> I wonder what version of postgresql he was testing.
>
Please, remove pgpool from your list of "reliable" postgresql tools.
It's decent, but child procs tend to go zombie from time to time.
--
erik jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
software development
emma(r)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-12-08 21:47:13 | Re: Performance figures from DbMail list |
| Previous Message | Steve Crawford | 2006-12-08 21:42:41 | Re: Male/female |