From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: IS it a good practice to use SERIAL as Primary Key? |
Date: | 2006-11-28 00:14:02 |
Message-ID: | 456B7F4A.8020003@cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/27/06 17:25, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 17:09 -0600, John McCawley wrote:
[snip]
> users
> =====
> id serial unique,
> first_name text,
> last_name text,
> primary key (first_name,last_name)
>
> Yes there are problems with the above, namely you will likely have more
> than one joshua drake.
Right, and then the question gets to: how do you create a "good"
user id? Many prefer serial types; I prefer something that is not a
monotonically incrementing scalar.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFa39KS9HxQb37XmcRAm+ZAKCAcpky09a2eTYMZX6HZiPIMECfcgCgrkXf
9oj3C45XcamX8avi5lYVn98=
=f0Ct
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Ribe | 2006-11-28 00:22:57 | Re: IS it a good practice to use SERIAL as Primary Key? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-28 00:02:54 | Re: IS it a good practice to use SERIAL as Primary Key? |