From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John McCawley <nospam(at)hardgeus(dot)com> |
Cc: | Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: IS it a good practice to use SERIAL as Primary Key? |
Date: | 2006-11-28 00:02:54 |
Message-ID: | 1164672174.6398.35.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 17:31 -0600, John McCawley wrote:
> I promise I'm not trying to be a pain in the butt ;) Do you then use
> your serial id as your foreign key in other tables, or the
> firstname/lastname primary key?
Now that is a good question. I would use the id, but that is not
technically proper :).
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >users
> >=====
> >id serial unique,
> >first_name text,
> >last_name text,
> >primary key (first_name,last_name)
> >
> >Yes there are problems with the above, namely you will likely have more
> >than one joshua drake.
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >
> >Joshua D. Drake
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2006-11-28 00:14:02 | Re: IS it a good practice to use SERIAL as Primary Key? |
Previous Message | Scott Ribe | 2006-11-27 23:53:43 | Re: IS it a good practice to use SERIAL as Primary Key? |