From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | developer(at)wexwarez(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: which version? old user coming back.... |
Date: | 2006-11-27 21:39:31 |
Message-ID: | 456B5B13.2090008@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
developer(at)wexwarez(dot)com wrote:
>>> ...Should I expect
>>> any problems with this even on the old 2.4 kernel?
>>
>> I'd advise you to be using a 2.6 kernel at this point, too.
>>
> ... I assume 8 will still work on 2.4 though.
IIRC, you need a reasonably modern 2.6 kernel (early 2005)
if you want fsync() to flush the write caches on hard
disks (IDE and SATA and SCSI included). The Linux SATA
driver author explains here:
http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=149349&cid=12519114
Anyone know if those write barrier patches were ever
backported into the 2.4 kernels?
If not, I think you need to either use 2.6 or disable
the disk's write caches and suffer the performance hits.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | George Weaver | 2006-11-27 21:42:19 | Re: PostgreSQL doesn't accept connections when Windows |
Previous Message | Scott Ribe | 2006-11-27 21:36:24 | Re: IS it a good practice to use SERIAL as Primary Key? |