Re: Memory usage per postmaster process

=?UTF-8?B?R3J6ZWdvcnogVGHFhGN6eWs=?= <goliatus(at)polzone(dot)pl> writes:
> On 11/02/2013 08:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Author: Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>> Branch: master Release: REL9_1_BR [3e5f9412d] 2010-10-06 19:31:05 -0400
>>
>> Reduce the memory requirement for large ispell dictionaries.
> I checked this patch:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTi=4fUi1zoFMpZ==Yf14RJDv_G1xgAkVQMDyEtBk@mail.gmail.com

> I can't find it here:
> http://doxygen.postgresql.org/spell_8c_source.html

> I also don't see those changes in 9.3.1 source. Status in commitfest
> list is " Committed". I can't see hold_memory anywhere.

If you read the rest of the discussion of the patch, you'd find out that
what got committed was not all that much like Pavel's original. But
it has the same effect.

regards, tom lane