Re: Memory usage per postmaster process

On 11/02/2013 08:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Author: Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Branch: master Release: REL9_1_BR [3e5f9412d] 2010-10-06 19:31:05 -0400
>
> Reduce the memory requirement for large ispell dictionaries.
I checked this patch:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTi=4fUi1zoFMpZ==Yf14RJDv_G1xgAkVQMDyEtBk@mail.gmail.com

I can't find it here:
http://doxygen.postgresql.org/spell_8c_source.html

I also don't see those changes in 9.3.1 source. Status in commitfest
list is " Committed". I can't see hold_memory anywhere.

> If you're not using ispell, it's not relevant, and I'm not sure whether
> the savings were significant for anything but Czech.
I am using ispell.

Thanks

--
Regards,
Grzegorz