Re: plperl/plperlu interaction

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl/plperlu interaction
Date: 2006-10-26 18:57:09
Message-ID: 45410505.8080502@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Anyway, it is probably not expected by many users that loading a module
>> in plperlu makes it available to plperl - I was slightly surprised
>> myself to see it work and I am probably more aware than most of perl and
>> plperl subtleties.
>>
>
> I think that is a bug and needs to be fixed. We have the precedent of
> pltcl, which uses separate interpreters for pltcl and pltclu for exactly
> this reason.
>
>

Fair enough.

I am not sure what our release timetable is - and presumably this should
also be backpatched if we regard it as a bug. I won't be able to do much
on this front for the next 2 weeks at least.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2006-10-26 19:06:13 Re: Replication documentation addition
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-26 18:32:07 Re: GUC description cleanup