Re: Replication documentation addition

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: Replication documentation addition
Date: 2006-10-26 19:06:13
Message-ID: 200610261506.14079.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 26 October 2006 10:45, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:46:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > So, like www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs/replication? That would
> > > work.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I like that idea, but I think that the URL needs to be decided upon,
> needs to be stable, and needs to be put into the docs. (I don't see
> it ATM, I guess because the URL isn't chosen yet?) We get so many
> questions about "what replication system" that I'm sure people are
> looking for outlines.
>
> A

Unfortunately the techdocs system won't support a url like the one above,
rather you'll end up with something more like the following
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.54 which is the "GUI Tools Guide"
(which is linked in the FAQ fwiw). Once it is in place, it will be stable
though.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-26 19:41:39 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-26 18:27:33 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-26 19:07:03 Re: Nasty btree deletion bug
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-10-26 18:57:09 Re: plperl/plperlu interaction