Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alexander Staubo <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net>, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Date: 2006-10-13 18:36:51
Message-ID: 452FDCC3.3090502@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Alexander Staubo (alex(at)purefiction(dot)net) wrote:
>> What formula did you use to get to that number? Is there a generic
>> way on Linux to turn off (controller-based?) write caching?
>
> Just a side-note, but if you've got a pretty good expectation that you
> won't be without power for 24 consecutive hours ever you can get a
> controller with a battery-backed write cache (some will do better than
> 24 hours too). For the performance concerned... :)

No to mention if you are *that* concerned you could buy a generator for
500 bucks that will keep the machine alive if you absolutely have to.

There is nothing wrong with write back cache as long as you have the
infrastructure to support it.

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2006-10-13 18:42:39 Re: A query planner that learns
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2006-10-13 18:32:26 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-10-13 18:40:42 Re: ./configure argument checking
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2006-10-13 18:32:26 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD