| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Staubo <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net> |
| Cc: | andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
| Date: | 2006-10-13 18:32:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20061013183226.GM24675@kenobi.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
* Alexander Staubo (alex(at)purefiction(dot)net) wrote:
> What formula did you use to get to that number? Is there a generic
> way on Linux to turn off (controller-based?) write caching?
Just a side-note, but if you've got a pretty good expectation that you
won't be without power for 24 consecutive hours ever you can get a
controller with a battery-backed write cache (some will do better than
24 hours too). For the performance concerned... :)
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-13 18:36:51 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
| Previous Message | Shane Ambler | 2006-10-13 18:22:39 | Re: Backup DB not getting connected |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-13 18:36:51 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-10-13 18:07:44 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |