| From: | Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: performance-test farm |
| Date: | 2011-05-13 02:19:17 |
| Message-ID: | 452191261.116010.1305253157665.JavaMail.root@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh My Man! How are you?!!
Is this the one?: http://planetdrizzle.org/
Lou Picciano
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 8:11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] performance-test farm
All,
BTW, if we want a kind of "performance unit test", Drizzle has a very
nice framework for this. And it's even already PostgreSQL-compatible.
I'm hunting for the link for it now ...
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-13 03:44:51 | Re: SSI-related code drift between index_getnext() and heap_hot_search_buffer() |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-05-13 01:44:43 | Re: Large Objects versus transactional behavior |