Re: TODO Request

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO Request
Date: 2006-09-02 23:53:00
Message-ID: 44FA195C.3060406@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Added to TODO:
>
> * Simplify ability to create partitioned tables
>
> This would allow creation of partitioned tables without requiring
> creation of rules for INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE, and constraints for
> rapid partition selection. Options could include range and hash
> partition selection.
>
> * Allow auto-selection of partitioned tables for min/max() operations
>
> I didn't add subparitions because that seems pretty complicated.

Thanks for this.

What about the other partioning types? And complicated should be what we
are after :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Can we get:
>> Well this should be fun.
>>
>>>> Multiple table indexes (for uniqueness across partitions for example)
>>>> Auto creations of partitions
>> This would be something like:
>>
>> create table foo () partition by ...
>>
>>>> Hash partitioning
>> Partitioning by HASH is used primarily to ensure an even distribution of
>> data among a predetermined number of partitions.
>>
>>>> Key partitioning
>> Partitioning by key is similar to partitioning by hash, except that
>> where hash partitioning employs a user-defined expression.
>>
>>>> Sub partitioning
>> Subpartitioning ? also known as composite partitioning ? is the further
>> division of each partition in a partitioned table. (partitions that have
>> partitions)
>>
>>
>>>> Added to the TODO list?
>>> Perhaps a certain amount of specificity as to what these mean,
>>> and why we need them, would be appropriate.
>> For reference I am directly apply my fair use rights to the above per
>> the MySQL development docs. Reference below:
>>
>> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/partitioning.html
>>
>> Yes I am fully aware that we don't need to do something just because
>> MySQL does it. However, Oracle has similar functionality and I would
>> like to see us keep up :)
>>
>> Of course I would like it to be done correctly :)
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Joshua D. Drake
>>
>>
>>> regards, tom lane
>>>
>>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
>> Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
>> Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
>> http://www.commandprompt.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-02 23:55:33 Re: TODO Request
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-09-02 23:51:09 Re: [HACKERS] gBorg status?