Re: [HACKERS] gBorg status?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] gBorg status?
Date: 2006-09-02 23:51:09
Message-ID: 44FA18ED.1090109@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:33:36AM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
>> What's up there? It has been down all week.
>>
>> We're trying to get the Slony-I 1.2 release out, so we can then
>> migrate over to pgFoundry. But that doesn't working terribly well
>> when gBorg's down...
>
> Speaking of which, what's the status of the migration tools? Is that
> ball still in Larry's court?

Moving to www where it belongs

Please see the thread cutting the gborg throat.

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-09-02 23:53:00 Re: TODO Request
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-02 23:48:43 Re: TODO Request

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-03 01:11:51 Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2006-09-02 22:51:37 Re: gBorg status?