From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Date: | 2006-08-17 19:35:08 |
Message-ID: | 44E4C4EC.4090109@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>> Doesn't bugzilla insist on sending you the complete bug every time?
>>
>
> Nope, it just sends the changes/additions. Other than the lack of a
> direct email input method, I find BZ quite usable. Josh was just
> complaining that its source code is a mess (dunno, haven't looked)
> but other than that I think it's a definite possibility, just because
> so many people are already familiar with it.
>
>
One other point about BZ - several community members (including me) put
in some effort to make the trunk version run on postgres, which it now
does, and quite well. So our using it would be a nice return compliment.
The source code might well be a mess, but for the most part it can just
be treated as a black box.
>> Whatever system is used (if one is), there definitly needs to be some
>> people looking over what comes in on the mailinglists (or on IRC, for
>> that matter) and pipe it off to the tracker in case it's not already
>> there.
>>
>
> Sure; we'd need a few volunteers handling that, no matter what software
> we pick.
>
>
>
You betcha. I'm glad we agree about that.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Zhang | 2006-08-17 19:42:20 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-17 19:29:23 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes |