| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Kenneth Marshall" <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Mark Kirkwood" <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
| Date: | 2006-08-17 19:15:04 |
| Message-ID: | 18528.1155842104@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> ... Red Hat's present bugzilla system
>> could be described that way --- and while I can't say I'm in
>> love with it, I can deal with it.
> Doesn't bugzilla insist on sending you the complete bug every time?
Nope, it just sends the changes/additions. Other than the lack of a
direct email input method, I find BZ quite usable. Josh was just
complaining that its source code is a mess (dunno, haven't looked)
but other than that I think it's a definite possibility, just because
so many people are already familiar with it.
> Whatever system is used (if one is), there definitly needs to be some
> people looking over what comes in on the mailinglists (or on IRC, for
> that matter) and pipe it off to the tracker in case it's not already
> there.
Sure; we'd need a few volunteers handling that, no matter what software
we pick.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-17 19:17:07 | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
| Previous Message | Jie Zhang | 2006-08-17 19:13:17 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes |