From: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | alfranio correia junior <alfranio(at)lsd(dot)di(dot)uminho(dot)pt> |
Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: standard interfaces for replication providers |
Date: | 2006-08-09 07:33:35 |
Message-ID: | 44D98FCF.90408@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Alfranio,
alfranio correia junior wrote:
> Of course not...
> It is impossible to build a replication system entirely by only using
> triggers...
Hm, I don't think it's impossible, just unpractical. Anyway, if you say
so yourself, I really doubt the use of GAPI. If you need to create your
own hooks anyway beside GAPI, why use GAPI at all? Better have one kind
of 'hooking' (i.e. with a dynamically loaded library).
> But definitely, there is a set of common requirements among a variety of
> replication systems. Moreover, such requirements are also useful to
> other systems as well.
So far, they are only partly usable for replication. I never looked into
materialized views or anything else that would benefit from such triggers.
Regards
Markus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2006-08-09 07:38:22 | Re: proposal for PL packages for 8.3. |
Previous Message | James | 2006-08-09 06:08:34 | BUG #2569: statement_timeout bug on Windows |