From: | alfranio correia junior <alfranio(at)lsd(dot)di(dot)uminho(dot)pt> |
---|---|
To: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: standard interfaces for replication providers |
Date: | 2006-08-08 18:37:18 |
Message-ID: | 44D8D9DE.50000@lsd.di.uminho.pt |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
>
> I'm questioning if a replication system can be written by only using
> triggers as hooks. AFAIK Slony-I uses triggers, so you can probably
> better comment on problems or limitations using triggers. For me a
> shared library with some hooks as C function calls seems a more
> plausible approach.
Of course not...
It is impossible to build a replication system entirely by only using
triggers...
But definitely, there is a set of common requirements among a variety of
replication systems. Moreover, such requirements are also useful to
other systems as well.
Roughly, the GAPI reflects any event inside a database system and allows
any application to intercept and modify them.
For instance, an event might be:
1 - database shutdown, startup
2 - connection shutdown, startup
3 - statement reception
4 - parsing
5 - execution plan generation
6 - tuples written
Our current prototype covers some of them and some of them partially (2,6).
Besides, we also need the priority mechanism.
Best regards,
Alfranio Junior.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-08 18:41:48 | Re: 8.2 features status |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-08-08 18:24:47 | Re: 8.2 features status |