From: | John Tregea <john(at)debraneys(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Aaron Bono <postgresql(at)aranya(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Storing encrypted data? |
Date: | 2006-07-20 11:52:24 |
Message-ID: | 44BF6E78.9090207@debraneys.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hi Aaron,
I removed them because when I bring the data back into my GUI, the
returns are treated as a record break by the software and I cannot
decrypt them or display the rest of the record that is not encrypted.
Regards
John T
Aaron Bono wrote:
> On 7/19/06, *John Tregea* <john(at)debraneys(dot)com
> <mailto:john(at)debraneys(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> I found that your suggestion worked well. For some reason the IDE
> I use
> (Revolution) put a return character every 73rd character when it
> did the
> base64encode, but I strip those out and there no further problems. I
> don't even have to put them back later to decode it.
>
>
>
> I usually leave the return characters where they are.
>
> I am curious, why did you decide to remove the return characters?
>
> ==================================================================
> Aaron Bono
> Aranya Software Technologies, Inc.
> http://www.aranya.com
> ==================================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Nikiforuk | 2006-07-20 13:46:41 | Error when trying to use a FOR loop |
Previous Message | Florian Weimer | 2006-07-20 07:31:16 | Re: INSERT/UPDATEs cycles and lack of phantom locking |