From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(dot)ebrecht(at)credativ(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Date: | 2006-07-18 04:39:59 |
Message-ID: | 44BC661F.80609@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway wrote:
>>>
>>>>> . multiple values clauses for INSERT
>
> The best way might be to fabricate a selectStmt equiv to
> "SELECT <targetlist> UNION ALL SELECT <targetlist>...",
> but that still feels like a hack.
Here is a patch pursuant to my earlier post. It has the advantage of
being fairly simple and noninvasive.
The major downside is that somewhere between 9000 and 10000
VALUES-targetlists produces "ERROR: stack depth limit exceeded".
Perhaps for the typical use-case this is sufficient though.
I'm open to better ideas, comments, objections...
Thanks,
Joe
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
multi-insert.diff | text/x-patch | 3.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heejin Mun | 2006-07-18 06:23:46 | I'd like to translate the english manual into Korean! |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-17 21:42:10 | Re: 8.2 features? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2006-07-18 05:21:54 | Re: 8.2 features? |
Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2006-07-18 04:05:10 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_regress in C |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Zhang | 2006-07-18 06:09:46 | On-disk Bitmap Index patch |
Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2006-07-18 04:05:10 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_regress in C |