From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(dot)ebrecht(at)credativ(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 features? |
Date: | 2006-07-17 21:42:10 |
Message-ID: | 44BC0432.3040509@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Bernd Helmle wrote:
>>
>> --On Freitag, Juli 14, 2006 01:23:11 +0200 Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>>>> . multiple values clauses for INSERT
>>>
>>> Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(dot)ebrecht(at)credativ(dot)de> was last heard to work on
>>> it. Updates, Susanne?
>>
>> I've talked to Susanne today and she's just back from hospital and not
>> available online until next week.
>> She was working on the SET (col1, col2) = (val1, val2) syntax for
>> UPDATE commands.
>> Don't know what the status is on this, though.
>
> Not the same thing, surely. So maybe we should gratefully accept Joe
> Conway's offer to work on it.
I've played with this a bit now, and the grammar changes seem pretty
straightforward, but the other half is kind of ugly. I can't see a good
way to propagate multiple targetlists that isn't a big hack.
The best way might be to fabricate a selectStmt equiv to
"SELECT <targetlist> UNION ALL SELECT <targetlist>...",
but that still feels like a hack.
Have there been any past discussions on how this might be implemented
(FWIW I couldn't find any in the archives)? Any better ideas for an
approach?
Thanks,
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-18 04:39:59 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Previous Message | Susanne Ebrecht | 2006-07-17 10:27:08 | Re: 8.2 features? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-07-17 21:44:55 | Re: plpython sets |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-17 21:27:36 | Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Reich | 2006-07-17 21:55:21 | Proposed patch for contrib/cube |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-17 21:27:36 | Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test |