From: | Alban Hertroys <alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2006-06-30 15:36:14 |
Message-ID: | 44A544EE.6080709@magproductions.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
Ron Johnson wrote:
>>begin;
>>create table xyz...
>>alter table abc...
>>insert into abc select * from iii
>>update iii...;
>>drop table iii;
>>(oops, I messed up something)
>>rollback;
>
>
> But isn't that what it means to be "transactional"? Or am I spoiled
> by my "big, expensive enterprise database"?
Well, according to my colleague here this wasn't possible until now
(partially!) in Oracle 10. Meaning it's not common-place even among
enterprise db's.
--
Alban Hertroys
alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl
magproductions b.v.
T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
7500 AK Enschede
// Integrate Your World //
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-30 15:39:04 | Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2006-06-30 15:33:42 | Re: limit results to one row per foreign object |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-30 15:39:04 | Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-06-30 15:22:28 | Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL |