From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2006-06-30 15:21:51 |
Message-ID: | 44A5418F.8040901@cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Scott Marlowe wrote:
[snip]
> However, the more interesting thing here, is that every
> statement, including DDL is transactable, except for a couple of
> big odd ones, like create database. So, in postgresql, you can do:
>
> begin;
> create table xyz...
> alter table abc...
> insert into abc select * from iii
> update iii...;
> drop table iii;
> (oops, I messed up something)
> rollback;
But isn't that what it means to be "transactional"? Or am I spoiled
by my "big, expensive enterprise database"?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEpUGPS9HxQb37XmcRAiJwAJ9/A/N/OgmslveSsX3Xym2QnDQz1gCghPD0
YX882Kv81hzZ4AKjaIVKHg8=
=Gsml
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-06-30 15:22:28 | Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-06-30 15:16:16 | Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL 8.1.4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-06-30 15:22:28 | Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-06-30 15:16:16 | Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL 8.1.4 |