| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] drop if exists remainder |
| Date: | 2006-06-08 18:39:55 |
| Message-ID: | 44886EFB.1010806@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> Important as you are, "one swallow does not make a summer".
>>
>
> On the other hand, unless we want the lists filling up with a bunch of
> +1 posts, it's probably better to assume that unless someone objects a
> patch would be accepted.
>
What happened was that Tom objected to (or at least queried the need
for) the patch on the grounds that it was bloat that nobody had asked
for. And when I asked I wasn't exactly deluged with requests to commit,
so I concluded that it was not generally wanted. Since then I have had
probably 10 requests for it, so I am now going to work to update it and
will post a revised patch.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-08 18:44:44 | Re: ADD/DROP INHERITS |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-06-08 18:30:02 | Re: [HACKERS] drop if exists remainder |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-06-08 18:47:56 | Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-06-08 18:30:02 | Re: [HACKERS] drop if exists remainder |