| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder |
| Date: | 2006-06-08 18:47:56 |
| Message-ID: | 200606081147.56746.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew,
> What happened was that Tom objected to (or at least queried the need
> for) the patch on the grounds that it was bloat that nobody had asked
> for. And when I asked I wasn't exactly deluged with requests to commit,
> so I concluded that it was not generally wanted.
Did you poll on -hackers or on -patches? A *lot* less people read
-patches.
This has been a problem in the past. I'd generally ask that, if a patch
which was discussed on -hackers gets rejected on -patches, that discussion
be brought back to -hackers. Often the people who supported the original
feature are not on -patches and then are unpleasantly surprised when the
feature they though was accepted doesn't show up in the next version.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2006-06-08 18:49:41 | Running a query twice to ensure cached results. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-08 18:44:44 | Re: ADD/DROP INHERITS |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-06-08 18:54:35 | Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-06-08 18:39:55 | Re: [HACKERS] drop if exists remainder |