| From: | Arnaud Lesauvage <thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Best high availability solution ? |
| Date: | 2006-05-31 10:27:29 |
| Message-ID: | 447D6F91.706@freesurf.fr |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Dave Page a écrit :
> Slony-I only exists for Windows in a not-even-beta state at the moment,
> so even if you get things up and running using a virtual IP solution you
> will be hand-holding Slony until it gets properly released.
OK, I thought it was in production stage.
> If I'm honest, I think your boss is going to be disappointed. You would
> add a *lot* of complexity to the system to make it handle failures with
> zero intervention, and that extra complexity is probably more likely to
> go wrong than a single server. I'd spend your time and money on making
> sure your raid & ups are good, that you are running on server grade
> hardware with ECC RAM, and that you have good out of band management
> facilities so even if you are away from the office you can connect via
> VPN/modem or whatever and fix things.
I think you're right.
Is there a simple replication solution for windows then ? Or will
I have to stop the master postgresql at night to pgdump and
pgrestore on the backup server ?
If I have a synchronized backup server (even if it synchronizes
once or twice a day, this might be OK), I could just write a
simple script that would change the host file of the clients to
have the postgresql's name to point to the backup IP...
--
Arnaud
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-05-31 10:29:21 | Re: UTF-8 context of BYTEA datatype?? |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-05-31 10:01:15 | Re: Best high availability solution ? |