From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: UTF-8 context of BYTEA datatype?? |
Date: | 2006-05-31 10:29:21 |
Message-ID: | 20060531102921.GE23169@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:31:28AM +0200, Daniel Verite wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
> > However, there is a solution: send the paramters seperate from the
> > query. In fact, postgres has been able to do that for a while now but
> > not all interfaces have been made to use it. My guess is that those
> > other databases you've used were already doing this so didn't see the
> > issue. I don't know if DBD:Pg does this though, maybe it needs to be
> > triggered somehow.
>
> Actually, this is the case already. When a parameter is explicitly
> typed as bytea, then libpq's PQexecPrepared is used and the binary
> contents are passed outside of the query.
Why isn't PQexecPrepared always used? And why does typing it SQL_BINARY
not do the same?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2006-05-31 10:34:11 | Re: Best high availability solution ? |
Previous Message | Arnaud Lesauvage | 2006-05-31 10:27:29 | Re: Best high availability solution ? |