From: | Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com |
Cc: | "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked |
Date: | 2006-05-24 21:10:45 |
Message-ID: | 4474CBD5.5050901@ca.afilias.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com wrote:
> http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/23/2228225
>
> here is an interesting thread regarding speed
> issues...
>
> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=186493&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=15391068
>
> bottom line - some real life users have compared pgsql
> to mysql in *some* cases and pgsql was faster.
You can design easily design test cases that will show one database to
be faster than the other. Fact is, most of those "Database A is faster
than Database B" shoot out articles are written by people who don't
understand databases. As for a lot of the people who talk about
databases on Slashdot, well, I won't go there.
Most of these comparisons use base, untuned configurations, do a trivial
set of operations, and jump to conclusions about which database is faster.
MySQL is faster than Postgres in some cases. That doesn't make MySQL a
faster database than Postgres, it just makes it faster in some cases.
Try hitting MySQL with a highly concurrent load and see what happens.
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | operationsengineer1 | 2006-05-24 22:06:53 | SQL Question |
Previous Message | operationsengineer1 | 2006-05-24 19:57:15 | Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users |