From: | <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrej Ricnik-Bay <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users |
Date: | 2006-05-24 19:57:15 |
Message-ID: | 20060524195715.42444.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
> On 5/25/06, operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com
> > imho, both are acceptably fast for the vast
> majority
> > of applications (which is why i went with features
> -
> > not the least of which was the license) and if it
> gets
> > so big it grinds to a halt, you are likely in the
> > commercial db space, anyway.
> /me has seen highly expensive, poorly designed
> Oracle implementations
> on amazing hardware grind to a halt ... :}
touche! from what i could tell, the fix was mostly to
prevent bad php developing from allowing sql
injection. iow, it wasn't an inherent problem in
pgsql assuming good programming practices... using
bind variables in your queries.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brad Nicholson | 2006-05-24 21:10:45 | Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked |
Previous Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2006-05-24 18:25:22 | Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users |