From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Date: | 2006-05-19 18:48:50 |
Message-ID: | 446E1312.9060807@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
> Actually, I think it's a lot more accurate to compare PostgreSQL and
> MySQL as FreeBSD vs Linux from about 5 years ago. Back then FreeBSD was
> clearly superior from a technology standpoint, and clearly playing
> second-fiddle when it came to users. And now, Linux is actually
> technically superior in most ways thanks to all the mindshare that's
> been poured into it.
And with that, I am going to sit in a lawn chair and watch the bonfire.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-19 18:58:02 | Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-19 18:44:11 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | max.poletto | 2006-05-19 18:51:00 | problem with PQsendQuery/PQgetResult and COPY FROM statement |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-19 18:44:32 | Re: New feature proposal |