Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "John DeSoi" <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-19 19:39:23
Message-ID: 18138.24.91.171.78.1148067563.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

>
>> Actually, I think it's a lot more accurate to compare PostgreSQL and
>> MySQL as FreeBSD vs Linux from about 5 years ago. Back then FreeBSD was
>> clearly superior from a technology standpoint, and clearly playing
>> second-fiddle when it came to users. And now, Linux is actually
>> technically superior in most ways thanks to all the mindshare that's
>> been poured into it.
>
> And with that, I am going to sit in a lawn chair and watch the bonfire.
>

Even I know that is NOT a discussion we want to start.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-05-19 19:58:58 Re: OO PostgreSQL Driver
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-05-19 19:14:39 Re: OO PostgreSQL Driver

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-19 19:39:36 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax
Previous Message Marc Munro 2006-05-19 19:35:35 Re: New feature proposal