From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Blair Lowe <postgresql(at)zedemail(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump and grants to PUBLIC |
Date: | 2006-05-09 17:00:31 |
Message-ID: | 4460CAAF.8030107@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Blair Lowe <postgresql(at)zedemail(dot)ca> writes:
>> On Mon, 2006-08-05 at 16:32 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> What version of PostgreSQL is this that you are using? Because it
>
>> ]# rpm -qi postgresql
>> Name : postgresql Relocations: (not
>> relocateable)
>> Version : 7.3.4 Vendor: Red Hat, Inc.
> ^^^^^
>
> That does not square with this:
>
>>> postgres(at)scratch:~$ psql -U test2 test2;
>>> Welcome to psql 8.1.3, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal.
> ^^^^^
>
> and the psql session is talking to test2 but you're dumping an
> unrelated database:
>
>>> postgres(at)scratch:~$ pg_dump test1;
>
> I see no evidence here that test1 didn't already have "foo" in it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Tom, you are commenting on my example of why his doesn't make sense :).
I used 8.1.3 to test his theory, but he is running 7.3.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ed L. | 2006-05-09 17:18:22 | InitBufferPoolAccess crash |
Previous Message | Blair Lowe | 2006-05-09 16:52:32 | Re: pg_dump and grants to PUBLIC |