Re: pg_dump and grants to PUBLIC

From: Blair Lowe <postgresql(at)zedemail(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump and grants to PUBLIC
Date: 2006-05-09 16:52:32
Message-ID: 1147193552.3730.95.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 12:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Blair Lowe <postgresql(at)zedemail(dot)ca> writes:
> > On Mon, 2006-08-05 at 16:32 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> What version of PostgreSQL is this that you are using? Because it
>
> > ]# rpm -qi postgresql
> > Name : postgresql Relocations: (not
> > relocateable)
> > Version : 7.3.4 Vendor: Red Hat, Inc.
> ^^^^^
>
> That does not square with this:
>
> >> postgres(at)scratch:~$ psql -U test2 test2;
> >> Welcome to psql 8.1.3, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal.
> ^^^^^
>
> and the psql session is talking to test2 but you're dumping an
> unrelated database:

Please read the ">>" that was from Joshua who was testing on 8.1.3, not
me. I am running 7.3.4.

In my test I do not see stuff2 either. The problem here is that I have
sensitive production data, so my tests are hard to read, and not able to
submit here.

So how do I recreate this template thing without killing production
data?

TTYL,
Blair.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-05-09 17:00:31 Re: pg_dump and grants to PUBLIC
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-05-09 16:25:11 Re: pg_dump and grants to PUBLIC