From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: corrupted item pointer:??? |
Date: | 2006-04-13 14:44:06 |
Message-ID: | 443E63B6.40105@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> On 4/13/06, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hmm - I believe that means a data/index block was corrupted.
>
> indices were recreated (reindex table), so i think this is data related
> problem.
>
> Have you seen any crashes, or hardware-related errors in your logs?
>
> nope. uptime is over 40 days.
>
> the machine is not used for anything else so i can't tell anything, but i
> didn't see any problems with it.
>
>
> What are your config settings, particularly the first three here:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/runtime-config-wal.html
>> fsync, wal_sync_method, full_page_writes
>>
>
> sure:
> fsync
> -------
> on
> wal_sync_method
> -----------------
> fdatasync
> full_page_writes
> ------------------
> on
All looks fine. Can you isolate the row(s) in question that seem to be
the problem? Then we can have a look at the system columns.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/ddl-system-columns.html
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2006-04-13 14:46:28 | Re: table as hashtable |
Previous Message | chris smith | 2006-04-13 14:41:49 | Re: the integer type |