Re: Is difference between PostgreSQL and mySQL licences

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Wall <d(dot)wall(at)computer(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is difference between PostgreSQL and mySQL licences
Date: 2006-04-10 01:03:29
Message-ID: 4439AEE1.9050309@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> applications are not GPL. It's mostly commercial apps that end up
> getting the license because businesses fear lawsuits more than
> individuals do (something like music "piracy" in which end users copying
> a CD to their disk drives are much less likely to be sued than if you
> produce products that incorporate the music inside).
>
> PostgreSQL is the way to go if you want a truly open source solution for
> your needs, whether commercial, private or open source.

Anyone who knows me, knows that I am in no way a MySQL fan. However the
above statement is patently false.

MySQL is truly open source, and in fact is also considered Free Software
in the sense that the FSF considers it free.

Yes PostgreSQL is more flexible but to be fair to MySQL, they have
contributed the majority of their code if and they have to pay for it
somehow. Software engineers are not cheap.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> David
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shoaib Mir 2006-04-10 05:28:59 Re: Postgresql with Access 97
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-04-10 00:49:35 Re: advice on schema for multilingual text