Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3

From: Leigh Dyer <leigh(at)eclinic(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Miguel <mmiranda(at)123(dot)com(dot)sv>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "Juan Casero (FL FLC)" <Juan(dot)Casero(at)wholefoods(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3
Date: 2006-04-06 07:42:27
Message-ID: 4434C663.9070702@eclinic.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Miguel wrote:
>
> Excuse me for this off topic, but i notice that you are very excited
> about the sun's hardware, what os do you install on them , slowlaris?,
> has that os improved in some espectacular way that i should take a look
> again?, i used it until solaris 9 and the performance was horrible.
> im a happy freebsd user now (using hp and dell hardware though)

I'm running Debian Sarge AMD64 on mine, and it works wonderfully. I'm
not a Solaris person, and I never plan on becoming one, but Sun's
Opteron hardware is quite nice. The remote management was one of the
features that sold me -- full control over power, etc. and
serial-over-LAN, through an SSH interface.

Sun don't support Debian officially (but we don't have a software
support contract anyway, so I'm not too fussed), but I'm pretty sure
they support at least SLES and RHEL.

Thanks
Leigh

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ragnar 2006-04-06 08:52:54 Re: Query planner is using wrong index.
Previous Message Robert Lor 2006-04-06 07:36:37 Re: bad performance on Solaris 10