Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3

Mark Kirkwood wrote:

>>
>>>> The newer Sun Opteron systems look nice too, but unless you're using
>>>> external storage, their little 2.5" hard drives may not be ideal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes - but they end-of-lifed the V20z and V40z!
>>>
>> That's quite disappointing to hear -- our V40z isn't even six months
>> old! We're not a big company, so external storage solutions are
>> outside our price range, but we still wanted a nice brand-name box,
>> and the V40z was a great deal compared to smaller boxes like the HP
>> DL385.
>>
>>> One big problem with the sun line in general is the tiny internal
>>> storage
>>> capacity - already too small on the V40z at 5/6 drives, now
>>> ridiculous at 4
>>> SAS drives on the galaxy series.
>>
>>
>> I'm sure those little SAS drives would be great for web servers and
>> other non-IO-intensive tasks though -- I'd love to get some X4100s in
>> to replace our Poweredge 1750s for that. It's a smart move overall
>> IMHO, but it's certainly not great for database serving.
>>
>>
>

Excuse me for this off topic, but i notice that you are very excited
about the sun's hardware, what os do you install on them , slowlaris?,
has that os improved in some espectacular way that i should take a look
again?, i used it until solaris 9 and the performance was horrible.
im a happy freebsd user now (using hp and dell hardware though)

---
Miguel