Re: Google SoC--Idea Request

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Date: 2006-08-14 12:40:56
Message-ID: 4430.1155559256@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:09:36AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's like a two-line patch, so hardly worth putting in TODO ... might
>> as well just do it. IIRC the motivation is mostly to silence a
>> Coverity warning?

> Well sort of. I can also just tick a box and the warning goes away too.
> It just seemed from the discussion that it was something people were
> going to fix...

Done now --- I have to admit I'd forgotten about it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-08-14 14:15:56 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-08-14 12:35:20 Re: Google SoC--Idea Request