Re: Google SoC--Idea Request

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Date: 2006-08-14 12:35:20
Message-ID: 20060814123520.GC11315@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:09:36AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Any thoughts on this? Make it a TODO item, document it, or simply
> > ignore it?
>
> It's like a two-line patch, so hardly worth putting in TODO ... might
> as well just do it. IIRC the motivation is mostly to silence a
> Coverity warning?

Well sort of. I can also just tick a box and the warning goes away too.
It just seemed from the discussion that it was something people were
going to fix...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-14 12:40:56 Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-14 12:12:08 Re: How to control the content of BKI files during installation process?