Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL

From: Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL
Date: 2006-03-06 15:01:04
Message-ID: 440C4EB0.1090300@pooteeweet.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> AFAIR they got a private scan done and they fixed the reported defects.
> After that they issued a press release telling how little defects they
> got, or something ...
>
> OTOH neither JBoss, BerkeleyDB, Qt are listed. Is there a pattern here?

I guess the pattern is obvious indeed:
Coverity probably wants a shot at selling their services to these
companies and rightly so imho.

regards,
Lukas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Boreham 2006-03-06 15:39:24 Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-03-06 14:55:56 Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL