From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | ben(at)coverity(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2006-03-06 14:55:56 |
Message-ID: | 20060306145556.GG4294@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Ben Chelf wrote:
> >Hello PostgreSQL Developers,
> >
> > I'm the CTO of Coverity, Inc., a company that does static source code
> >analysis to look for defects in code. You may have heard of us or of our
> >technology from its days at Stanford (the "Stanford Checker"). The
> >reason I'm writing is because we have set up a framework internally to
> >continually scan open source projects and provide the results of our
> >analysis back to the developers of those projects. PostgreSQL is one of
> >the 32 projects currently scanned at:
> >
> >http://scan.coverity.com
>
> Hm, interestingly and in contrast to some announcements, MySQL is not
> included in this list. Did it blast the defects column ? :-)
AFAIR they got a private scan done and they fixed the reported defects.
After that they issued a press release telling how little defects they
got, or something ...
OTOH neither JBoss, BerkeleyDB, Qt are listed. Is there a pattern here?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lukas Smith | 2006-03-06 15:01:04 | Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-03-06 14:54:02 | Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL |