Re: implement prepared queries in plperl

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: dmitry(at)karasik(dot)eu(dot)org, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: implement prepared queries in plperl
Date: 2006-03-01 22:54:02
Message-ID: 4406260A.4070704@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


I am waiting for an update from Dmitry.

cheers

andrew

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Is this patch going to be applied?
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>I have cleaned this patch somewhat by removing some bitrot that occurred
>>since it was submitted, and adjusting formatting to something more
>>closely resembling postgresql style (please remember to follow our style
>>in future).
>>
>>The attached works on HEAD and passes the supplied regression tests.
>>
>>But why do we have to call spi_freeplan? pltcl, which has prepared
>>queries, doesn't require this AFAICS. If memory leaks are an issue,
>>maybe we should bless the object into a class with a DESTROY method that
>>calls spi_freeplan automatically (not sure to do that in XS but I assume
>>it's possible).
>>
>>
>>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2006-03-01 22:54:35 Re: [SQL] Interval subtracting
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-01 22:45:47 Re: [SQL] Interval subtracting

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2006-03-01 22:54:35 Re: [SQL] Interval subtracting
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-01 22:45:47 Re: [SQL] Interval subtracting