From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl(dot)pgsql-odbc(at)telemetry(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Production version of ODBC drivers |
Date: | 2006-02-20 18:13:06 |
Message-ID: | 43FA06B2.7020204@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 11:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
>>
>>> Is there a URL showing which Win-32 ODBC binary is considered sufficiently
>>> stable for production use?
>>>
>> The latest one on the FTP server is the recommended one.
>>
>
> Yes, but /which/ FTP server and /where/? The last one I pulled was (I think)
> when Hiroshi was still in charge, and since then as I understand it it's passed
> through at least one set of hands- plus recent discussion I see here which
> suggests that the project has forked into ODBC vs ODBCng.
>
No. There is no fork. There are two FOSS open source drivers:
1. ODBC which can be had from any of the PostgreSQL mirrors
2. ODBCng which is a brand new (not finished yet) driver for PostgreSQL.
ODBCng can be found here:
http://projects.commandprompt.com/projects/public/odbcng
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-02-20 18:18:06 | Re: ANSI and Unicode driver |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2006-02-20 18:08:40 | Re: ANSI and Unicode driver |