| From: | Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl(dot)pgsql-odbc(at)telemetry(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Production version of ODBC drivers |
| Date: | 2006-02-20 14:59:22 |
| Message-ID: | 43F9D94A.E4C156FC@telemetry.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 11:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
> > Is there a URL showing which Win-32 ODBC binary is considered sufficiently
> > stable for production use?
>
> The latest one on the FTP server is the recommended one.
Yes, but /which/ FTP server and /where/? The last one I pulled was (I think)
when Hiroshi was still in charge, and since then as I understand it it's passed
through at least one set of hands- plus recent discussion I see here which
suggests that the project has forked into ODBC vs ODBCng.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-02-20 15:15:31 | Re: Production version of ODBC drivers |
| Previous Message | Marc Herbert | 2006-02-20 14:19:43 | Re: TCP_NO_DELAY & TcpAckFrequency (Re: Slow query through |