| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgxs/windows |
| Date: | 2006-01-16 00:40:58 |
| Message-ID: | 43CAEB9A.5020002@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>dllwrap doesn't seem to get given LDFLAGS, and maybe doesn't honor it
>>either.
>>
>>
>
>I wouldn't expect it to handle everything that might appear in LDFLAGS,
>but maybe it ought to be given the -L items from LDFLAGS (compare the
>way we copy just those items into SHLIB_LINK).
>
>What's confusing me at the moment is that it seems to work for Magnus.
>Are you maybe working from different source trees? I believe we changed
>around the handling of these switches recently. Maybe in his copy, the
>-L items from LDFLAGS are making it into the dllwrap command via
>SHLIB_LINK.
>
>
>
>
I am working against 8.1 from the installer - he is working against a
local mingw install.
Also, he might be working from a later toolset - I have gcc3.2.4 while
gcc 3.4.2 is the latest mingw release - some other tools might also be
mildly out of date.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 01:00:05 | Re: pgxs/windows |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-01-16 00:20:16 | Re: Problem with the Planner |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 01:00:05 | Re: pgxs/windows |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 00:15:43 | Re: pgxs/windows |