From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgxs/windows |
Date: | 2006-01-16 00:15:43 |
Message-ID: | 24660.1137370543@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> dllwrap doesn't seem to get given LDFLAGS, and maybe doesn't honor it
> either.
I wouldn't expect it to handle everything that might appear in LDFLAGS,
but maybe it ought to be given the -L items from LDFLAGS (compare the
way we copy just those items into SHLIB_LINK).
What's confusing me at the moment is that it seems to work for Magnus.
Are you maybe working from different source trees? I believe we changed
around the handling of these switches recently. Maybe in his copy, the
-L items from LDFLAGS are making it into the dllwrap command via
SHLIB_LINK.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-01-16 00:20:16 | Re: Problem with the Planner |
Previous Message | Anjan Kumar. A. | 2006-01-15 23:35:04 | Problem with the Planner |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-01-16 00:40:58 | Re: pgxs/windows |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-01-15 23:20:28 | Re: pgxs/windows |